Igniting tension


When Narendra Modi addressed workers of BJP on the day Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh was won, he presciently cautioned them that in the days to come, serious efforts would be made by some sections to spread the poison of casteism and strife. “It has taken a lifetime,” Modi noted, “for those like us, to cleanse and free the state of Gujarat from the poison of casteism. We fought this vicious cycle for three decades before ridding the state of it,” he reminded those who had gathered.

The recent Bhima-Koregaon incident clearly indicates that there is indeed a concerted and renewed effort at trying to divide Indian society and tear open its healing faultlines. The Bhima-Koregaon event has been celebrated over many years, why is it that this year, it was chosen to be hyped up, why were nefarious elements like Umar Khalid, a leading voice of the “breaking India” brigade, in whose support Rahul Gandhi had leapt across into the Jawaharlal Nehru University, invited; why was Jignesh Mevani invited to give provocative speeches inciting violence, spewing venom; from where did hoodlums with saffron flags suddenly descend and disrupt the gathering; how did Rahul Gandhi, within minutes of the incident put out a tweet accusing the RSS and BJP of being anti-Dalit and fascist?

Why saffron flags, was it to reinforce the false stereotype of “saffron terror” and “saffron intolerance”, a false stereotype that has been very carefully crafted and nurtured by a section of the “organised elite” with sympathies and active support from Naxalites and India breakers? The entire script, the entire act seemed very well choreographed with the objective of disrupting life in a non-Congress ruled state and to target RSS and BJP by adding a pint of saffron in the act was a part of that larger design to deflect the blame to other quarters while the actual schemers would pass off as victims.

Congress’s Rahul Gandhi era has indeed come, and in that era, the party shall increasingly outsource its politics to extraneous elements, elements through which it will seek to disrupt societal balance, exacerbate faultlines, widen fissures and give the image of an India under siege. This time around, Rahul’s Congress has outsourced its politics to forces that are inimical to India and have at their heart the twin objectives of defeating Modi and of destabilising India. These two aspects are obviously linked; by weakening and eventually defeating Modi, these forces hope to weaken the fabric of India. Thus the JNU “breaking India” brigade, a section of communists, lapsed Marxists, Naxal sympathisers were active in support of Mevani during the Gujarat elections, and in his victory, they perceive a new mascot who can further their agenda of sharpening faultlines in India. On the other hand, defeat in Gujarat has made the Congress desperate for 2019; Rahul, therefore, plans to align with these groups that have been at the forefront of subterfuge and sabotage. With half-roots in a land that had a past political culture of fascism, Rahul is quick to identify these, align with them and then push forward his agenda. This knack for fascist action, this propensity to see and read every situation from the fascist lens, is what Rahul has specialised in. His desperation to see Modi unseated goads Rahul to support those elements in the academia and intelligentsia who have been repeatedly calling for India’s disintegration. He is thus aligning with the Popular Front of India (PFI), which has till date butchered more than 20 BJP workers in Karnataka and has worked to radicalise the western coast of the state. Rahul remains silent because he needs the support of such groups in order to try and unseat Modi or to hold on to his state. In Tripura, while the goons patronised by the communist regime go on a killing spree of BJP workers, most of whom belong to the Dalit sections of society, Rahul remains silent for he needs the communists as allies in his larger goal of unseating Modi. The largest number of Dalit Members of Parliament belong to BJP, it is Modi’s governance vision which has seen initiatives being undertaken that have a direct impact on uplifting the quality of life of the marginalised and the oppressed. It is BJP which showed the determination to empower a Dalit, from the grassroots, with a humble background to adorn the office of the President of India. That Rahul Gandhi and his mother have not had the decency of calling on Ram Nath Kovind, even after more than hundred days have elapsed since the latter assumed the office of the President of the Indian Republic, speaks volume of their actual stance and attitude towards Dalit empowerment. In his action of Dalit empowerment, in his determination to achieve a larger pan-Indian unity beyond the barriers of caste and creed, Modi has displayed an unequivocal and steely steadfastness. It is a steadfastness that gives strength to his vision of a new India while unsettling those whose politics thrive on division, disunity and debilitation, it is they who are trying to light bush fires of conflict and clash.

How Nehruvian Consensus compromised India’s security

PM Modi has broken the Nehruvian Consensus on how our borders must be defended. This has unnerved India’s adversaries both within and outside the country. On 13 June 1962, Hem Barua, legendary poet, politician and Praja Socialist Party member of Parliament, representing Mangaldoi constituency in Assam, asked a pointed question …

Discover inspiring analogies in history to promote Indianness

In exploring this link with Bengal and Gujarat, let us begin with Sri Aurobindo. On the day when Prime Minister Modi, a Gujarati, was reciting Gurudev Rabindranath Tagore’s hope-instilling immortal poem, ‘Ore Nutan Juger Bhore’, to the people of West Bengal through his address to the Indian Chamber of Commerce …

On the wrong side of history

As PM Modi attempts to settle our unsettled history, the Gandhi family must answer for the mistakes of Pandit Nehru in extolling the communists, eschewing national defence and misreading Chinese intentions In his foreword to Sitaram Ram Goel’s book, In Defence of Comrade Krishna Menon: a political biography of Pandit …